![]() students are able to collaborate with others by inviting them to edit their composition all changes are made in real time so all collaborating students can see the changes students are able to choose from many different instruments and are able to add a virtually unlimited number of instruments to their composition when using the app, you are able to still work on a composition if offline your composition will automatically be updated to the cloud when you are online again Flat is an online program no need to download anything (unless you are using the app) Once signed in, you will have access to the free version of Flat. You are able to create an account by using Google, Apple, Facebook, or email and password. I imagine newer versions of their "baby" model are probably even better is web-based music notation program. Very much a beginner's model it nonetheless has done what I needed and rather well. Jokes aside, I have only used my now "legacy" Sibelius G7. ![]() Good luck.Where were you when I needed you ten years ago hiking up the learning curve? It will only add to your skill set and make you more useful in the field. If you have some free time on your hands and you want a challenge, then dive into Finale. If you're good at Sibelius and you're happy with the program you may want to live with the occasional corrupt file when transferring over to Finale. This is great when you know how to use it but frustrating if you're trying to figure out how everything works. Where Sibelius has many useful shortcuts and templates that make workflow easy, Finale allows you the freedom to build things from the ground up and in any way you want. I know a lot of professional composers who use it and it is by far the most popular software taught in music schools.įinale is more flexible and in my opinion more powerful but is more work to master. That doesn't mean it can't be used professionally. Sibelius is easier to use for a novice or intermediate user. Both are excellent but they are different and each have their strengths and weaknesses. There's no use bagging on either software. I teach Sibelius at MI and I am a copyist for various orchestrators that all use Finale. I don't know if Sibelius offer the same thing, they probably do, but I am glad that Finale offer a substancial discount for educators. (Newer versions open files saved with older versions, but not the other way around, so it it means that people in our circle have to update to the same versions - we usually go every two years.) One thing I hate is that we all must have not only the same software but also the same version if we share scores back and forth. They're both good (and also frustrating at times), and they both are the standard programs. ![]() If you only share PDFs, try them both and go for the one you prefer. If some use F and other use S, just go with the one your most frequent collaborators use. I am not talking for sharing PDFs, but the files in the proprietary format. I think a good way to decide between Finale and Sibelius is to first check which one your friends and collaborators use, and get the same one. I am sure that someone used to Sibelius would stay with it if they were in a similar situation and tried Finale. Me, I'm used to Finale and after trying out Sibelius, I decided to stay with Finale. From what I've gathered, if you start getting used to one of them, you'll probably hate the other one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |